Feedback on the first draft of the Bellagio Principles on Valuing Water (Preamble)

Does the preamble adequately frame the “why” of the principles?

Back to overview

Comments

Trudi Schifter 4 months ago

YES, my goodness, this does not need to be repeated and repeated. Rather shorten it and focus on the main statistics

  0     0
Sanjay Banka 4 months ago

Yes

  0     0
Guillermo Saavedra 4 months ago

YES

  0     0
Sutardi 4 months ago

yes

  0     0
martina Zupan 4 months ago

more or less yes

  0     0
D. Hirsch 4 months ago

yes

  0     0
Shahjahan Bhatti 4 months ago

Wish more science was emphasized to achieve IWRM.

  0     0
Giacomo Galli 3 months ago

It could benefit from a bit more elaboration on the urgency ("why now?") as well as to the pertinence ("what does this add to what is already out there?").

  0     0
JOHN WAWERU 3 months ago

YES

  0     0
John Waweru Gakunga 3 months ago

Yes

  0     0
David Groenfeldt 3 months ago

Paragraph 2 provides a rationale for making water values explicit (to give voice to easily overlooked dimensions) but there is also a more fundamental reason: Water is a commons, and the use for one purpose (e.g., mining) will affect other stakeholders.

  0     0
FELICIA IRIMA NGAJI-USIBE 3 months ago

Yes

  0     0
José Antonio Gutiérrez Gnecchi 2 months ago

The document presents a concise, yet thorough description of the underlying motivations.

  0     0
Alexandra 1 month ago

yes

  0     0
Alexandra 1 month ago

yes

  0     0
José Antonio Gutiérrez Gnecchi 2 months ago

The document presents a concise, yet thorough description of the underlying motivations.

  0     0
FELICIA IRIMA NGAJI-USIBE 3 months ago

Yes

  0     0
David Groenfeldt 3 months ago

Paragraph 2 provides a rationale for making water values explicit (to give voice to easily overlooked dimensions) but there is also a more fundamental reason: Water is a commons, and the use for one purpose (e.g., mining) will affect other stakeholders.

  0     0
John Waweru Gakunga 3 months ago

Yes

  0     0
JOHN WAWERU 3 months ago

YES

  0     0
Giacomo Galli 3 months ago

It could benefit from a bit more elaboration on the urgency ("why now?") as well as to the pertinence ("what does this add to what is already out there?").

  0     0
Shahjahan Bhatti 4 months ago

Wish more science was emphasized to achieve IWRM.

  0     0
D. Hirsch 4 months ago

yes

  0     0
martina Zupan 4 months ago

more or less yes

  0     0
Sutardi 4 months ago

yes

  0     0
Guillermo Saavedra 4 months ago

YES

  0     0
Sanjay Banka 4 months ago

Yes

  0     0
Trudi Schifter 4 months ago

YES, my goodness, this does not need to be repeated and repeated. Rather shorten it and focus on the main statistics

  0     0
Alexandra 1 month ago

yes

  0     0
José Antonio Gutiérrez Gnecchi 2 months ago

The document presents a concise, yet thorough description of the underlying motivations.

  0     0
FELICIA IRIMA NGAJI-USIBE 3 months ago

Yes

  0     0
David Groenfeldt 3 months ago

Paragraph 2 provides a rationale for making water values explicit (to give voice to easily overlooked dimensions) but there is also a more fundamental reason: Water is a commons, and the use for one purpose (e.g., mining) will affect other stakeholders.

  0     0
John Waweru Gakunga 3 months ago

Yes

  0     0
JOHN WAWERU 3 months ago

YES

  0     0
Giacomo Galli 3 months ago

It could benefit from a bit more elaboration on the urgency ("why now?") as well as to the pertinence ("what does this add to what is already out there?").

  0     0
Shahjahan Bhatti 4 months ago

Wish more science was emphasized to achieve IWRM.

  0     0
D. Hirsch 4 months ago

yes

  0     0
martina Zupan 4 months ago

more or less yes

  0     0
Sutardi 4 months ago

yes

  0     0
Guillermo Saavedra 4 months ago

YES

  0     0
Sanjay Banka 4 months ago

Yes

  0     0
Trudi Schifter 4 months ago

YES, my goodness, this does not need to be repeated and repeated. Rather shorten it and focus on the main statistics

  0     0
Alexandra 1 month ago

yes

  0     0
José Antonio Gutiérrez Gnecchi 2 months ago

The document presents a concise, yet thorough description of the underlying motivations.

  0     0
FELICIA IRIMA NGAJI-USIBE 3 months ago

Yes

  0     0
David Groenfeldt 3 months ago

Paragraph 2 provides a rationale for making water values explicit (to give voice to easily overlooked dimensions) but there is also a more fundamental reason: Water is a commons, and the use for one purpose (e.g., mining) will affect other stakeholders.

  0     0
John Waweru Gakunga 3 months ago

Yes

  0     0
JOHN WAWERU 3 months ago

YES

  0     0
Giacomo Galli 3 months ago

It could benefit from a bit more elaboration on the urgency ("why now?") as well as to the pertinence ("what does this add to what is already out there?").

  0     0
Shahjahan Bhatti 4 months ago

Wish more science was emphasized to achieve IWRM.

  0     0
D. Hirsch 4 months ago

yes

  0     0
martina Zupan 4 months ago

more or less yes

  0     0
Sutardi 4 months ago

yes

  0     0
Guillermo Saavedra 4 months ago

YES

  0     0
Sanjay Banka 4 months ago

Yes

  0     0
Trudi Schifter 4 months ago

YES, my goodness, this does not need to be repeated and repeated. Rather shorten it and focus on the main statistics

  0     0
Alexandra 1 month ago

yes

  0     0
José Antonio Gutiérrez Gnecchi 2 months ago

The document presents a concise, yet thorough description of the underlying motivations.

  0     0
FELICIA IRIMA NGAJI-USIBE 3 months ago

Yes

  0     0
David Groenfeldt 3 months ago

Paragraph 2 provides a rationale for making water values explicit (to give voice to easily overlooked dimensions) but there is also a more fundamental reason: Water is a commons, and the use for one purpose (e.g., mining) will affect other stakeholders.

  0     0
John Waweru Gakunga 3 months ago

Yes

  0     0
JOHN WAWERU 3 months ago

YES

  0     0
Giacomo Galli 3 months ago

It could benefit from a bit more elaboration on the urgency ("why now?") as well as to the pertinence ("what does this add to what is already out there?").

  0     0
Shahjahan Bhatti 4 months ago

Wish more science was emphasized to achieve IWRM.

  0     0
D. Hirsch 4 months ago

yes

  0     0
martina Zupan 4 months ago

more or less yes

  0     0
Sutardi 4 months ago

yes

  0     0
Guillermo Saavedra 4 months ago

YES

  0     0
Sanjay Banka 4 months ago

Yes

  0     0
Trudi Schifter 4 months ago

YES, my goodness, this does not need to be repeated and repeated. Rather shorten it and focus on the main statistics

  0     0
Alexandra 1 month ago

yes

  0     0
José Antonio Gutiérrez Gnecchi 2 months ago

The document presents a concise, yet thorough description of the underlying motivations.

  0     0
FELICIA IRIMA NGAJI-USIBE 3 months ago

Yes

  0     0
David Groenfeldt 3 months ago

Paragraph 2 provides a rationale for making water values explicit (to give voice to easily overlooked dimensions) but there is also a more fundamental reason: Water is a commons, and the use for one purpose (e.g., mining) will affect other stakeholders.

  0     0
John Waweru Gakunga 3 months ago

Yes

  0     0
JOHN WAWERU 3 months ago

YES

  0     0
Giacomo Galli 3 months ago

It could benefit from a bit more elaboration on the urgency ("why now?") as well as to the pertinence ("what does this add to what is already out there?").

  0     0
Shahjahan Bhatti 4 months ago

Wish more science was emphasized to achieve IWRM.

  0     0
D. Hirsch 4 months ago

yes

  0     0
martina Zupan 4 months ago

more or less yes

  0     0
Sutardi 4 months ago

yes

  0     0
Guillermo Saavedra 4 months ago

YES

  0     0
Sanjay Banka 4 months ago

Yes

  0     0
Trudi Schifter 4 months ago

YES, my goodness, this does not need to be repeated and repeated. Rather shorten it and focus on the main statistics

  0     0
Alexandra 1 month ago

yes

  0     0
José Antonio Gutiérrez Gnecchi 2 months ago

The document presents a concise, yet thorough description of the underlying motivations.

  0     0
FELICIA IRIMA NGAJI-USIBE 3 months ago

Yes

  0     0
David Groenfeldt 3 months ago

Paragraph 2 provides a rationale for making water values explicit (to give voice to easily overlooked dimensions) but there is also a more fundamental reason: Water is a commons, and the use for one purpose (e.g., mining) will affect other stakeholders.

  0     0
John Waweru Gakunga 3 months ago

Yes

  0     0
JOHN WAWERU 3 months ago

YES

  0     0
Giacomo Galli 3 months ago

It could benefit from a bit more elaboration on the urgency ("why now?") as well as to the pertinence ("what does this add to what is already out there?").

  0     0
Shahjahan Bhatti 4 months ago

Wish more science was emphasized to achieve IWRM.

  0     0
D. Hirsch 4 months ago

yes

  0     0
martina Zupan 4 months ago

more or less yes

  0     0
Sutardi 4 months ago

yes

  0     0
Guillermo Saavedra 4 months ago

YES

  0     0
Sanjay Banka 4 months ago

Yes

  0     0
Trudi Schifter 4 months ago

YES, my goodness, this does not need to be repeated and repeated. Rather shorten it and focus on the main statistics

  0     0